Tag Archives: Glenkinchie

Special Releases 2010

24 Oct

On the 22nd of October we we’re fortunate enough to be invited to the Scottish launch of Diageo’s 2010 special releases. The event took place at the beautiful Blair Athol distillery just outside Pitlochry in Perthshire. I wont go into too many of the giddy details but needless to say the dinner, the drams and the hotel were all wonderful and we’re grateful to Diageo for the invite and their warm hospitality. Luckily I was able to ‘liberate’ samples of each release in order to write some more detailed notes on each one. So without further waffling ado and in no particular order, here are my notes for the 2010 special releases.

(please note these were not tried all at once but individually or in pairs over the course of a few days)

Glen Spey 21yo. Special release 1989-2010 OB. 50.4%. 70cl

Colour: Amber

Nose: There is a really dusty, full, fresh bourbon aroma here. Lots of vanilla cream, cocoanut, crème brulee and some custard, also toffee, caramelised oatmeal and natural caramel. Quite chocolatey with hints of pine resin (retsina?)  and some ‘forest after a rainstorm’ freshness in the background, after a while this becomes more like air freshener and looses some of it’s natural qualities. There is a little spiciness but it is very gentle and not at all dominating, very clean fresh American oak character but it is also very sweet and intense. Now some fresh oranges and hints of coriander marmalade.

Palate: Very sweet and very modern on delivery. Loads of rich vanilla and wood vanilins, then spicy and cloyingly sweet with a high concentration of fresh bourbon characteristics. If you like bourbon/sweet whisky/vanilla then you’ll love this. No obvious flaws at all in the profile so far, the flavours are a little lopsided and concentrated but it’s otherwise a flawless example of this extreme, modern style, a very acquired taste I would say. Now quite creamy and foamy with candy floss, toasted marshmallows, butter, bitter oak, cereals and cloves.

Finish: Medium to long in length but becoming quite astringent, leaves behind a real sticky sweetness.

Comments: This one is really only for fans of first fill bourbon maturation and very sweet whiskies. Its not to my taste at all, for me it lacks a little complexity and balance but I think it’s a very good example of a sweeter, more modern profile.

Score: 83/100

Caol Ila 12yo. Special Release 2010. ‘Unpeated Style’ OB. 57.6%. 70cl.

Colour: White Wine.

Nose: Amusingly peaty for an ‘unpeated style’ Caol Ila. Lots going on here, green malt, pleasingly grainy at first becoming richer with time, also gristy and oily with quite an industrial, mechanical theme going on. Very delicate medicinal hints of mercurochrome, bandages and germoline, classic Caol Ila aromas but here they are much more subdued and delicate. Also something quite vegetal like hints of a good quality reposado tequila. Mashy, boiled potatoes, cereal and some sooty, coal tar soap aromas, also slightly waxy and grassy, this nose is great!

Palate: Immediate big notes of oily, green, smoky malt, very savory whisky, there is a delicate sweetness to the whole affair but it feels like the wood is very much playing a supporting role here. Again more mashy and some really big vegetal qualities, that streak of peat gives it some very distinctive Mezcal qualites. Buttered toast, gentian root, geraniums and more floral, flowery freshness about it after a little time. There is something slightly dirty in there as well but it’s great, it adds a real earthiness to those vegetal flavours, a really unique angle on Caol Ila if you ask me.

Finish: Long and oily developing more earthy, sooty notes and some citrus freshness as well. Great!

Comments: This year’s release of unpeated Caol Ila is considerably lower in strength than previous releases. I was told by one of the Diageo managers that this is because for a while they were suffering a brief shortage of casks and started filling at full strength without diluting the spirit. So that solves that mystery, so much for all our late night heated discussions about casks being stored at the tops of rack warehouses and the like.  This is one of the best releases of this style of Caol Ila so far in my humble opinion, this should be brilliant after 30 years in bottle.

Score: 90/100

Glenkinchie 20yo. Special Releases 1990-2010. OB. 55.1%. 70cl.

Colour: Pale Gold

Nose: Smells somehow much older than it is but simultaneously incredibly fresh. Newly cut grass, sweet oak, green apples, beeswax, honeycomb, like so many other light spirits Glenkinchie seems to come alive with a bit of age behind it, this leaves the standard 12yo in the dust.  Now some ripe pears, bananas, pineapple and juicy fruit chewing gum, great early morning whisky. It’s really fresh and lively but there is no denying its maturity, it seems perfectly aged. A hint of spice in the background.

Palate: At full strength the attack is big but tethered by some very lovely honeysuckle and delicate vanilla notes. More grassiness and green fruit with a hint of minerality as well. Then some really well infused spiciness and tanned leather, hints of old books and floral aspects like dandelions. A little water brings some drier elements to the fore, more white fruit, hessian, some nail polish and cocoanut.

Finish: Quite long and sweet, fading honey, clean vanilla, oak and some glimmers of green fruits.

Comments: I really think Glenkinchie comes alive with age, this is a great, natural example of the make. Good, tasty whisky.

Score: 89/100

Cragganmore 21yo. Special releases 1989-2010. OB. 56%. 70cl.

Colour: Straw.

Nose: Big whiffs of damp straw, steel wool, some damp sawdust, workshops, honeysuckle and even some green and delicately tropical fruit notes underneath everything. Furniture polish (there’s a definite hint of Mr sheen about it) and hints of fresh vanilla as well. After a while it starts to become a little grassy and mentholated, wears its age very deftly. More vanilla and homemade custard, quite creamy now but still very fresh, bananas and pears with some apricot jam in the background. Very typical, a very ‘Diageo’ profile so far in my book. With water it suddenly becomes all aromatic and herbaceous with garden fruits and olive oil, still very attractive.

Palate: Big delivery with a dense bundle of hot, white peppery alcohol. Fizzy sherbert, candy floss, hints of liquorice and turpentine. This could have been one of the Rare Malts series so easily. Needs water methinks… still pretty lively with water, plenty of drying spicy qualities and clean, delicate oaky tones. Something quite leathery and meaty after a while, a bit Mortlachy maybe? This is quite a robust Cragganmore, now there is lots of chewy, sinewy malted barley all over the joint, quite earthy and farmy too. Finally a little herbaceous with some chives and rosemary, interesting.

Finish: Long and malty with a gentle honey/spice kick and some green fruitiness.

Comments: I like this Cragganmore, it’s very much in keeping with the other Special Releases from this distillery. I would say for me it’s better than the 17yo but not quite as good as the 10yo or the old 29yo. Still a flawlessly constructed dram all the same though.

Score: 89/100

Auchroisk 20yo. Special Releases 2010. OB. 58.1%. 70cl.

Colour: Honey.

Nose: Earthy and oily with hints of green olives and pastry. Then becoming suggestively sweet with hints of anise and Pernod. Some clean malty, honey notes emerge but otherwise this nose is a bit quiet. Lets give it some time… starts to develop these oily facets very gently, goes off on tangents of olive oil and engine oil, very delicate farmy notes and stables. Now some notes of tinned lychees in syrup start to emerge along with some bubblegum and buttered toast. This is quite a tricky whisky. With water there are some very light notes of hessian and paraffin and the vanilla is a little louder but still quite closed and shy.

Palate: Massively alcoholic at full strength, almost painfully so. Some hints of very dead wood and dried cocoanut shavings with a fleeting marzipan nuttiness but otherwise quite closed. Needs water. Now there is some very attractive, delicate green fruitiness, grassy with more metallic notes, quite steely. This is immensely austere and unsexy, now there are minerals, bizarre notes of fresh pasta and olive oil, maybe something a little dank as well, its not quite cardboard but its something found in an old damp attic for sure. A little zesty lemon rind as well and some flinty, white flowers.

Finish: Austere, and difficult, leaves quite a long drying, borderline astringent sensation in the mouth.

Comments: I didn’t like this when I tried it at the launch, I’m really glad I took a sample away because to get the most from it you really need time and patience. It’s a very difficult, austere and sexless whisky, in fact I’d say it was very grumpy and curmudgeonly. Anyway I like it more after a proper try but its not a session dram at all, charmingly bad tempered and austere but very difficult. Needs a little water.

Score: 88/100

Lagavulin 12yo. Special Releases 2010. OB. 56.5%. 70cl.

Colour: White wine

Nose: Peat oil, dry seaweed and delicate vanilla with bags of coastal character. Seashore, wet pebbles, fresh oysters with lemon juice, clean saltiness, all the classic coastal aromas in spades. Now there is that industrial oiliness coming through as well like in all the best modern peated malts. It’s really balanced. Old hay bales and farmy stables with hints of manure and grass. This is unmistakably 12yo Lagavulin. Some really controlled medicinal nuances as well, gentian root, bandages, hospitals and a whiff of bleach. There are also some suggestions of old Kreel nets and rope kicking about in there.

Palate: Big, oily peat laden delivery, clean and dry with only a suggestion of vanilla sweetness round the edges. A little smoky, like a bonfire on a beach but its not a dominant part of the profile, the main concentration is very much in keeping with the peat and coastal elements of the nose. Minerals, pebbles and flints, like sucking a lump of granite dipped in lemon juice. Hints of salt and vinegar with soy sauce and limejuice, even at full strength its quite drinkable despite its epic flavours. Towards the swallow there are some really earthy, sooty phenols, coal, wet peat and mulchy leaves. Big, tarry creosols as well.

Finish: Long and oily, oily, oily. With more granite

Comments: Brilliant, as usual. But then what did you expect from Lagavulin 12?

Score: 91/100

Brora 30yo. Special Releases 2010. OB. 54.3%. 70cl.

Colour: Gold

Nose: Waxy, oily coal and hints of hessian, damp sackcloth and dunnage warehouses. Lots of minerals, all kinds of white stone fruits and honey. This smells just like a 72 Clynelish. Aloe vera, citrus and some fresh grassy smoke with some really fragrant, gentle coastal attributes. On the nose this is nowhere near as big as previous official releases of Brora but it is intensely old school, fruity, complicated and unsexy. You really need time to get to grips with it. Some really soft, oily phenols in the background.

Palate: We are still a lot closer to a 1972 Clynelish than a classic Brora in style. There are loads of beautiful waxy, honey complexities on the palate initially with tiny hints of lavender, more peat than the nose suggested but still full of white fruit and coastal freshness. Seaweed, salt, lemon zest, engine oil, some very salty porridge that your Gran might have kept in a drawer and served with a trowel. White flowers and fragrant soaps with a lick of spice. It just keeps continuing with endless combinations and tangents of all these classic old Highland characteristics.

Finish: Long, oily, waxy, difficult and very old school. Final hints of flints and burned toast.

Comments: The stock that’s gone into this current 30yo is obviously from the much later era of 1979/1980 Brora as the peat is really tender and diminished in this example, it really tastes just like an early seventies Clynelish. However that is not to detract from it, this is still beautifully old style, difficult, unsexy and wonderfully complex whisky. Spend time with this one, it’s a perfect example of a dead highland style and as such is a truly rewarding whisky.

Score 92/100

Talisker 30yo. Special Releases 2010. OB. 57.3%. 70cl.

Colour: Gold

Nose: Intensely sea-fresh, delicate twists of white pepper, wholegrain mustard and bags of soft green and white fruits. Kelp, preserved lemons, tar and some really beautiful old peat oils simmering in the background. Lots of mineral and granite like flint qualities, beautifully balanced between delicate oily sweetness and pristine, dry, coastal aromas. Briny notes of smoked mussels and fresh shellfish, then something moreish and savory like leeks frying in butter and cullen skink. After a while it even starts to become slightly tropical.

Palate: Classic Talisker, big and peppery. Earthy, oily peat, grassy smoke, more saline, preserved lemon notes and eucalyptus oil. This is another one that seems to open up beautifully with time. Green tea, earl grey, kippers, more fat, greasy oiliness, old rope, kiwis and green apples. Another flawlessly clean and pristine profile that just seems to keep on developing these beautiful sub-flavours. After time there is more spice, some subtle old wood astringency and a tiny nugget of vanilla.

Finish: Long and full of salt, oily kippers, white pepper and floral/coastal freshness.

Comments: Like the regular releases of Lagavulin 12yo these 30yo Taliskers are just brilliant every time. A wonderful example of how phenols can generate power and fragility in equal measure as a whisky ages. Beautifully balanced, complex whisky.

Score: 92/100

Port Ellen 31yo. Special Releases 1978-2010. 54.6%. 70cl.

Colour: Straw.

Nose:  Quite austere, drying and mineral on first nosing with an interesting dirty/green fruit combo. Lots of salty coastal notes mingling with fresh lemon juice and some sooty, dusty, old attic must. White flowers and a sharp gooseberry acid like quality, a very austere nose this one. Delicate whiffs of antiseptic, iodine, swimming pools and putty. Quite a straight, sharp peatiness going on with delicate notes of smoked tea, dried herbs and cured ham. Like the Talisker and the Brora this Port Ellen opens up very nicely given plenty of time.

Palate: Quite a stinging saltiness at first giving way very rapidly to lots of green tea, hot smoked salmon, leather and some more dirty, earthy fruit. Some crisp, smoky cereal malt flavours appear slowly with more coastal, flowery freshness as well. Now there is buttery pastries (croissants, brioche), lime curd, motor oil and acrylic. Quite a difficult Port Ellen, we found at the tasting it came alive very nicely with blue cheese but on its own it remains quite a stubborn creature.

Finish: Quite long but very gentle, fades slowly with drying and delicate flavours of smoked tea and tarry rope. Also a big, thick meatiness remains that seems to come from nowhere.

Comments: There is no denying this is a quality Port Ellen and it’s always a privilege to taste an example at this age but its not quite as stellar as the 3rd or the mighty 9th release in my book. However it remains a very rewarding dram for those with time on their hands.

Score: 90/100

Definiely time for a nap after all that.

So what have we learned? Well I liked the Talisker and the Brora best but that’s no surprise. The Caol Ila was brilliantly unusual and surprising and the Lagavulin is as great as always. The others are all commendable apart from the Glen Spey but that’s as much a personal thing as anything else. There should be no shortage of new tasting notes in the coming month as I’ve just received a huge haul of interesting new samples and I’ll be attending the Whisky Show in London next week so I’ll probably gather a fair few liquid trinkets there as well. If you’re going to the show then hopefully I’ll see you there. Slante!

The Taste of Lost Love

23 Aug

I have already written about my love for both St Magdalene and Lochside so they need little reintroduction from me here. These are another couple of samples I liberated from whisky fringe (courtesy of  the very generous folks at Douglas Laing). Suffice to say that I thought it might be interesting to do a little head to head with these two whiskies as they both represent quite old school ‘Highland Style’ whiskies. I know St Mag is technically a lowlander but its complex, often very dry and minerally house style really reminds me of these oily, waxy old highland style spirits. Likewise Lochside seems to display this character quite often as well albeit with a perhaps a little more expressive fruitiness. Anyway I love both of them and, both being closed, they are sadly missed. Both samples are from the very latter eras of production in their respective histories so I suspect that they may not shine as brightly as older examples but who knows? I’m still excited to try them both.

The Lochside 1991. Pale yet inviting. Like an albino supermodel?

Lochside 1991 18yo. Douglas Laing OMC. 289 bottles. 50%. 70cl. Refill Hoggie.

Colour: Straw gold.

Nose: Immediately flinty, slightly mentholated and fruity with some lovely clean malt underneath. There are hints of that classic Lochside tropical fruit character coming out now, bits of melon, mango and pineapple, a delicate fruit salad really. Some tart citrus aromas as well, very delicate and beautifully composed nose this. It doesn’t seem to develop too much further but what is there holds together really beautifully and is so aromatically delicious that it doesn’t really matter, a minimalist poem of a nose. Some delicate wisps of oily hessian and coal now, also something like waxy honeycomb as well. A fragrant floral aspect develops after a while as well. I wouldn’t want to touch this with water, it seems so fragile yet composed.

Palate: Very dry and savory on the palate at first with freshly baked whole meal bread and lemon rind. Then becomes delicately sweet towards the swallow. Seville orange marmalade and some simmering spices, there is also a slightly unfortunate flavour of rotting orange peel but its not too overpowering, in fact given time it disappears. There are also some rather pleasant flavours of nutmeg and delicate vanilla, pastry, licorice and a slight herbaciousness. My only real qualm is that it lacks more of that Lochside trademark fruitiness.

Finish: medium length but quite warming and leaves a pleasant dry fruitiness behind.

Comments: I feel the palate let this one down a bit but the nose is still gorgeous. A pleasant Lochside that shows snapshots of its glorious past and just how amazing it can be when it wants to be. I suspect like all distilleries it suffered from the modernisations of the late seventies and eighties. Anyway I think its worth…

Score: 88/100 (mostly for the nose)

The St Mag 1982. This one looks rather inviting too but I can't think of anymore supermodel analogies. Or maybe I just don't want to?

St Magdalene 1982 26yo. Douglas Laing OMC. 511 bottles. 50%. 70cl. Refill Butt.

Colour: Pale gold

Nose: Rich, oily and pungent with grassy and nettle like aromas, almost like a sauvignon. Wonderful mineral and fruit complexity. Sweet peas, orange blossom, engine oil, gasoline, paraffin wax, its just laden with aroma this one. Its becomes even more aromatic the more time you give it, now almost more like a Riesling with some dense honied and gentle tropical notes. Damp sheep’s wool, farminess and something slightly coastal as well, citrus and sea-breezes. Porridge oats and other cereals, a clean toastiness with just a scraping of butter. Some aged characteristics also like old books, leather armchairs and a little tobacco leaf. Enough of this, its great, time to taste it…

Palate: Its just a big bucket of oil and fruit really. Very rich and mouth-coating with a beautiful dryness and minerality. Lots of orange blossom, honeysuckle and more petrol characters. Flinty but also delicately honied and slightly briny as well. This is a difficult one to handle and keep track of but boy is it worth it. There is that beautiful preserved lemon waxiness and olive oil combo that is common in these old school whiskies, then more lean maltiness and cereal character. Its also slightly meaty in a bizarre move sideways. Just great whisky.

Finish: Long, drying, fruity, oily, aromatic and beautiful.

Comments: This is a perfect example of a more old school, highland style of whisky. It is a million miles away from what we are told these days is a ‘traditional Lowland style’. This whisky would chew up a modern Glenkinchie or Auchentoshan like wet rice crackers. Its big, its oily, its very fruity and its dry, it tastes like old sheep fanks and engine oil, its just beautiful. However it is also incredibly unsexy, a difficult style of whisky to know what to do with and a difficult whisky full stop. Its the kind of whisky that makes you work for its nuances, its austere and difficult to know, it demands something of the drinker. For me this is why I love these kinds of whisky, they energize the mind as well as the palate and bring out a greater shared experience between those who drink it. Its quite moving to taste these spirits because they aren’t really made like this anymore and as they become rarer and fade away, they just seem to taste better every time.

Score: 91/100

A Masochistic Lowlander

19 Jul

Today we’ll do something a bit different, a proper full tasting and a music pairing. Ok I’ll admit its not a particularly earth shattering development on my already established formats but hey, its sunday and I’m just a crazy guy! Today we will be tasting a rather inviting looking Rosebank. Of all the Lowlanders that have been lost/almost lost in recent decades it seems to be Rosebank that is most lamented. I always felt St Magdalene was a greater loss personally but that’s not to say I don’t get misty eyes occasionally over a fine Rosebank. I think the problem is that Rosebank has garnered itself a bit of a reputation for greatness and, especially now that there is an ever increasing stream of independent bottlings popping up, it struggles sometimes to live up to this image. Having said all that nit-picky nonsense, it still remains a beautiful and quite unique malt. Certainly the choice of Glenkinchie in favour of Rosebank was a decision laced with criminality. Well done Diageo, lets have nice pretty distillery that all the nice tourists can come and take nice pretty photos of. Never mind the fact that its whisky tastes like grass juice with a personality phobia (most of the time). Anyway on with the tasting.

The Rosebank in current olfactory question.

Rosebank 1990. 19yo. cask no 5082 refill butt. 444 bottles. Douglas Laing OMC. 50% vol. 70cl.

Colour: Lemon gold.

Nose: A little closed at first, notes of lavender, citrus and wax polish. Becomes quickly very fragrant, white flowers, fresh grass, meadows and some beautiful delicate waxiness. Maybe a little coal tar soap and lanolin, there is something slightly oily and pleasantly soapy about it. The nose feels a little fragile but otherwise very together and expressive, quite beautiful even if not overly complex.

Palate: Hot, prickly and spicy with quite a lot of sharp astringency, feels like a very aggressive, difficult delivery. Not particularly pleasant, lets try it with water. Ok with water its easier and fruitier but there is still quite some astringency. The waxiness picks up again after a while and more floral character as on the nose. Some more delicate spiciness now with something unusual like milk chocolate. This is quite a difficult dram to be honest, not undrinkable or unenjoyable but its making you work for the good stuff. After a while once the water has marinaded a bit it starts to loosen up and get a bit easier but its still a little masochistic.

Finish: Medium length with good oily after-texture (is there such a thing?) Spicy and sharp again with something a little cardboardy in the background and even maybe a hint of butyric.

Comments: err…weird. Not sure what to make of this one, the nose was lovely but the palate was a bit bonkers and angry. For me its a little imbalanced but still entertaining in a ‘mad’ sort of way.

Score: 80/100

Ok this was unexpected and puts me in a bit of a predicament as I now have to find some music to match such a tricky whisky. Its not unpalatable by any means but its certainly an acquired taste and not something suitable for session dramming. Its the sort of whisky you pour when you want to stay sharp and maybe you need to think. Maybe you are angry with yourself, maybe its been a bad day and you’re beating yourself up about something. This is a dram for odd and specific occasions. It doesn’t fit in with the usual to and fro, the common tick tock motion of life, its a wildcard, a madcap rather than a nightcap. So lets have some madcap music courtesy of Mr Zappa.

Frank Zappa there with Stinkfoot, live in 1974. A mystical guitar player, nightmarish claymation imagery ‘solo’, a traveling circus for a band and the sum total is: some kind of genius. Music to rouse you from dark moods and stormy days, without madness there can be no sanity and sometimes sanity needs a night off, Zappa and reckless Rosebanks are evidently for those nights.