Tag Archives: Strathisla

The Queen Of The Moorlands: An Olfactory Investigation

25 Aug

Not to be confused with the Queen of The He-Brides.

I first met David Wood on a rather brisk night on Islay back in summer 2005. We both happened to be staying for the night at the Bruichladdich accommodation and one of the first utterances he sent my way, laden with the dead weight of a solid northern English accent, was: “Alright Angus, d’you wanna try our bottlings?” Now normally I might have been taken aback by such a sentence but this was Islay and here the context of any conversation surrenders itself so easily to the lurking subject of whisky. So I just grinned stupidly and said “Wow! You do your own bottlings? Brilliant!” Five minutes later I was tucking into a 35yo Strathisla, following somewhat unwisely on the heels of a mind-blowing 12yo Laphroaig.

David Wood, the brains behind the small but inimitable Queen Of The Moorlands Whisky co.

The Queen Of The Moorlands is the name given to the whisky part of the Leek based business The Wine Shop. Its a small, independent wine and spirits merchants run by David and his wife Leonie, David takes care of Whisky and beer and Leonie handles the monolith that is Wine. Its a set up that has worked well for them and for their customers as they seem to go from strength to strength every year. Not hung up by setbacks but not crazily ambitious either, it is a small company that clearly grows slowly on a solid foundation of understanding and passion. The whisky bottlings started life as something different for them to offer their customers, they already had a large range of whiskies and it seemed the next logical step up. However the way they did it was not particularly ‘by the book’.

Bruichladdich 1991. QOTM. Edition XX. 70cl. 52.8%.

Colour: gold with a touch of green.

Nose: Fresh, invigorating, lively, classic Bruichladdich. Lots of green fruits and coastal interplay. Some sweet spicy vanilla from the bourbon but still quite aromatic and interesting. Quite a pungent wee Bruichladdich, lots of oiliness and brine. With water there are some beautiful floral aromas, wet pebbles on a shore, water seems to make it even fresher.

Palate: Initially its sweet cereals, vanilla and camphor oil, then it becomes quickly drying and salty. Citrus and greengages with some big chewy spice notes. I sense this may need some water. With water its all olive oil and buttered toast, more green fruit hanging around in the background and still quite fat and oily. There is also a lovely fragrant, lanolin soap character after a while.

Finish: Long and suddenly quite peppery with a lovely polished aftertaste and a final briny prickle.

Comments: Shame they’ve given up doing this kind of bottling at Bruichladdich these days.

Score: 88/100

The Earl Grey inn, a sadly departed Jewel in the crown of Staffordshire.

If the above image does not fill you with visions of concrete urinals, walls of old whisky boxes and an elderly woman grumpily watching trashy British saturday night television while fortifying herself with Gin and cigarettes then I think it is safe to say, you never visited the Earl Grey Inn. This, now tragically closed establishment, was an eccentricity of epic proportions. To walk inside you would be enveloped into a windowless rainbow of grey and yellow, a world of ancient whisky boxes stacked high up walls that puckered under the stains of decades. You would be led in across a carpet untainted by cleaning products, an aged relic that wore the grease of a thousand familiar footsteps, the wreckage of spilt pints and half sucked cigarettes with grotty pride. Here you could order mystery pints from unlabeled beer taps that would fill your glass with an earth liquid like some frothy Bovril tribute band. Here you could have shots of old Macallan 25yo for £2 then relieve yourself after in the concrete mezzanine that lay out back past further ancient cardboard mazes. Truly a place to drink. It was here that the first Queen Of The Moorlands bottlings were selected by Dave and his friends and customers. Not the usual way these things are done but then its fitting considering that these are often pretty special whiskies. I attended one of these sessions back in 2006 and I must admit it was wonderful. There was none of the usual hooha that goes along with these kind of selection sessions, no brightly lit clean rooms with white surfaces, water jugs, tasting notepads and spittoons. Here was a hole at the back of the pub lit with candles, in worrying proximity to thirty year old cardboard boxes, and a decrepit 40 watt corner lamp. Here were pints, drams and northerners. This was something different, something joyous, and I think that same spirit of fun has never left these bottlings.

Glenglassaugh 1984. QOTM. Edition VII. 70cl. 53.8%.

Colour: Mahogany

Nose: There is plenty of sherry character but it is quite soft and not overpowering, instead it lets quite a lot of elegant fruit character come through. There are some gunflints and earthiness but it is more on forest mulch and wet leaves rather than off notes, it provides a little muscle I feel. Its very well balanced with the sherry, it wears its strength quite lightly, there is almost no nose prickle. More notes of sultanas, aged brandy and tobacco, then some figs and fresh banana bread with a lovely hint of walnuts and maple syrup. Water seems to magnify its forest flora and leafy characters, just like that earthy fresh smell when you walk through the woods after heavy rain. Delicate rancio and spice aromas also.

Palate: The palate is still quite soft but the sherry is a little more apparent and tannic now, some more lovely nutty characters, hazelnuts and pecans. Its surprisingly clean really, I was expecting some sulphur but I really can’t find any. Its just on the brink of too heavy for me but it treads the line so delicately that I find it really quite entertaining. More fig rolls and syrupy characters, now comes lots of dark chocolate, like a sponge cake or something. Lets see how it swims. More soft fruitiness, old pipe tobacco, dry and delicate spiciness with a little walnut oil. Some quite determined notes of aged balsamico and more meatiness than when neat.

Finish: Long, clean and retaining that moreish flinty stewed fruity combo, still has lovely poise.

Comments: Its been a long time since I tried this whisky and its much better than I remember. I really like how it just wavers on the line of being too chunky and heavy and every time you think its going to topple over it moves back and throws something fresh at you. I think its really classy stuff and the best Glenglassaugh I’ve had in a long time.

Score: 89/100

David likes to pour his drams in arty black and white in order to lend his whiskies a certain aura of decadence.

Despite the Earl Grey being closed now (rip) David is still busy traveling around the north of England and frequently to Scotland, promoting his Whiskies. He has one of the healthiest attitudes to whisky I’ve ever encountered in a merchant in that he has genuine passion but without any clouding sense of snobbery attached. If you happen to visit his stand at one one of the many shows in England at which he exhibits or attend one of his terminally laid back tastings, you will be encouraged not only to try many delicious drams but also to contribute to, ask and opine about what you are drinking. David’s strength has always been to let the whiskies do the talking first and foremost, he believes in education and face to face contact with his customers and this attitude of honest and straight talking has kept him and his whiskies on safe ground. If you get a chance to visit his shop it is well worth it, just as it is if you take the time to meet him and sample his wares on one of his regular pilgrimages to Islay, especially during the festival when he is the only independent bottler to provide a festival bottling.

One of David's finest finds, the infamous 'Blacksmith's Bowmore'.

Bowmore 1991. QOTM. Edition XVIII. 70cl. 57.7%. Fresh Sherry Hoggie.

Colour: Amber

Nose: Its striking how this resembles a completely different older style of Bowmore than the stuff that preceded it by only a couple of years or so. Its so clean and fresh with some gorgeous, understated tropical fruits. The sherry is present but its so fruity and light, it has completely integrated itself with the house style of the distillery. Really coastal and vibrant, light citrus, fresh oysters, brine, tar and fishnets, just lovely. Some beautiful peat oils also, the nose is amazingly soft and outspoken for the strength. Now orange blossom and marmalade with yet more fruit, guavas and mangos, amazingly there is also still a hint of malt under all that, a dusty, smoky maltiness. After a while it becomes slightly mentholated as well. Water makes the nose brighter, fresher and more mentholated.

Palate: Stupendously oily and mouth-coating. Its almost like nothing happens for a few seconds and then BANG! All that fruit and peat is all over the place. Was this really distilled after 1974? More immense coastal character, I’m almost afraid to add water to this, lets wait. The size of the whisky seems to mask the level of alcohol, this is really what Islay whisky is about to me, the intensity of flavour but also the balance and complexity, the way it dances between peat and fruit like this, just heartwarming. Now it becomes very tarry and mentholated with lots of smoky salty flavours. There are flavours of kippers, olive oil, hessian, paraffin and something sharp like lemon juice and gooseberries. Lets try water now, just a drip. More fresh coastal flavours and a really gentle thread of green fruit. It also becomes earthier and the peat takes on a rooty, dense quality, its still really oily. This swims very well, water softens it but doesn’t diminish its beauty at all.

Finish: Very long. Leaves you trying to scrape the peat oil off the roof of your mouth with you tongue. Gently drying and tropical with more sinus clearing menthol traces.

Comments: If ever there was an example of how much Bowmore improved in the early nineties then this is it. I really love it. Well done Bowmore and well done Dave and co for bottling it. I think I might have to actually find and buy a bottle of this one, I’m imagining it after thirty years of bottle aging.

Score: 91/100

David presents his wares at one of his annual Islay festival tastings.

The whiskies that I’ve selected for tasting in this post, as you might guess from my rather enthusiastic tasting notes above, are some of my favourite Queen Of The Moorlands bottlings. They are not all as glorious as the ones I am fortunate enough to have here but they are, in my opinion, some of the most consistent releases by any independent bottler. The thing that marks them as special is that they are not an essential part of David and Leonie’s business, David has done nearly 40 different bottlings in the last few years but for every ten bottlings chosen he rejects hundreds of samples. This is one of the hallmarks of consistently interesting and delicious bottlings, freedom. The freedom to say no is so important and is so often forgotten when it comes to independent bottlers. There are several companies who’s main source of income is independent bottlings of whisky. If they happen upon the opportunity to buy a cask of Brora or Port Ellen for example then they will more than likely bottle it because it will sell on the strength of the distillery name alone, regardless of the actual quality of the whisky. I won’t share with you the list of whiskies Dave has rejected but it contains some names and ages that might baffle other bottlers. Having the freedom and the strength to say no is often the greatest of assets to an independent bottler, you can taste as much when you try Dave’s whiskies.

The 1998 Laphroaig aka: The Beast!

Laphroaig 1998/2007. QOTM. Edition XXIII. 287 bottles. 70cl. 55.3%.

Colour: white wine.

Nose: A big peat trough. Very peaty, ashy, lemony and iodiney(?) just like all these excellent young, modern Laphroaigs. Very austere and minerally, lots of coastal aromas, oysters and lemon juice, crab meat, wet pebbles, seaweed. Then there are the classic Laphroaig medicine notes, lots of mercurochrome, iodine, tcp and germoline, it really reeks of hospitals. Water reveals a little more floral white fruit character but it is still filled with medicine and a really deft oiliness. Freshly ground sea salt and vinaigrette.

Palate: It really is wonderful to see the house style laid so straight and bare like this, there is almost no wood on display at all, a hint of sweetness and vanilla but its only fleeting. The rest is bandages, oil boiler sheds, raw peat, bonfire smoke, gentian root and sharp lemon juice. This is a very big and bold young Laphroaig, I imagine this is what you might get if you distilled the carpet from The Earl Grey. With water there is again a little touch of white fruit and more saline vinegar characters but on the whole its remarkably stable, perhaps a little fresher and free than when neat. Some smoked haddock and cullen skink flavours after a while with some mashy cooked veg elements as well. A meal of a dram, pass the knife and fork!

Finish: Quite long and with lots of turfy, wet peat and medicinal seaweed lurking about.

Comments: I love this young, naked style of Laphroaig and thankfully, like Bowmore, there are plenty of them around these days. Its not the most complex of drams but everything is so profoundly delivered and intense that it more than makes up for it.

Score: 90/100

I case you're wondering, the Gaelic on the stencil means "Its not easy". Take from that what you will.

Dave’s whiskies are not particularly widespread in their availability, this is certainly deliberate to an extent as he wants to focus the majority of sales through his own business. If you’re looking for them then the latest releases can be found on David and Leonie’s website and there is also a nice little back catalogue here at whisky online. There are also usually quite a few of Dave’s peatier offerings floating about the Islay Whisky shop if you find yourself in Bowmore of an afternoon. The most important thing is that you try them if you get the opportunity as they are exceptional, worthwhile and consistent whiskies. They are about a passion for whisky, a sense of fun and enjoyment and they don’t take themselves too seriously, an attitude we could all do well to remember from time to time. Lets finish with one of my favourites (well it is my blog after all). Queen Of The Moorlands 1982 Caol Ila for the 2008 Islay festival.

The 1982, sadly there were only 60 bottles of this glorious old sea monster.

Caol Ila 1982/2008. QOTM. Edition XXVI. 70cl. 61.9%. Bottle 22 of 60.

Colour: Gold

Nose: Hot and appley at first, stewed apples with custard and lots of smoked tea (early grey). The alcohol tones itself down after a few moments and it suddenly burst into full on Caol Ila mode. Its just so typical of Caol Ila from the early eighties, its almost impossible to find a bad one from 82 or 83. Green, grassy and laden with candied fruit, greengages, toffee apples, plum jam and pear liqueur. It becomes coastal and medicinal in equal measure after a little while with really lean saline and germoline aromas, there is also something farmy and oily about the nose, like a well oiled engine in a barn (oh dear lord!). With water its like a smoked ham with honey and eucalyptus notes coming through as well. Even more briny and salty now.

Palate: Pow! So that’s where all the alcohol was hiding, quite sweet at first with all the peppery heat but it also brings some absolutely delicious peat oils and more drying medicine. A little bit of a chocolate orange as well, anyway lets add a wee dash of water…now we’re back to tea only this time its green. More green fruit flavours, lashings of them in fact. Another drop of water and its still going, just keeps on engaging every part of the palate. This Caol Ila dances with water like a flying fish. Its really green but so intense and aromatic, it becomes kind of herbacious now but still very salty and invigorating. This is one of those whiskies that you could pour over for hours. Ok enough tasting notes, you get it by now.

Finish: Very very long. No teeth brushing for me tonight.

Comments: Ok I feel the need to reiterate, not all of Dave’s bottlings are this good, we’re not in Italy in the eighties (sadly). There has been a little bit of cherry picking on my part for this post but I wanted to give you an example of how good these whiskies can be. This Caol Ila and the Bowmore in particular are probably two of the best examples, there was also the long gone Strathisla and THIS Laphroaig that are up on the same level. But really you should try some of these bottlings for yourself, they are brilliant. Sadly this Caol Ila is a miniscule bottling of only 60 bottles so inevitably its just as frustrating as it is beautiful. Still, there’ll always be another beautiful dram somewhere down the line, after all that’s what keeps us all going isn’t it?

Score: 91/100

A Trilogy of Glenfarclas

18 Aug

Glenfarclas is one of a handful of spirits that can age with a wealth of grace and dignity unlike many others. It is also a distillery from which there are, fortunately for us all, many aged examples available at accessible prices, just look at this for example. However I always found it a little more difficult at great ages than its not too distant cousins Glen Grant, Strathisla and Longmorn. Not always I would stress, I have been fortunate enough to taste many deliriously beautiful aged Glenfarclas, I just find that the heavily sherried expressions can sometimes be a little too dense, a little too tannic or cloying. So it will be interesting to see what happens with the three 40 year old plus sherry monsters I have lined up for today’s tasting. First up is the one I have no photo for…

Speyside’s Finest 40yo 1969/2009. Douglas Laing. 50%. 70cl. ref OMC 1672.

Colour: Ronseal wood stain

Nose: There’s that big chunky sherry. Lots of dark chocolate, mulling spices, and a very clean fruitiness, some notes of red fruit and jam also. I find it quite lively and even a little alcoholic on the nose. No off notes, very clean and quite succulent sherry characters. Cloves and mincemeat, lots of christmasy characteristics as per usual in these ancient sherried drams. After a little time in the glass it develops some unusual aromas of wet sawdust and maybe even a hint of cardboard, it also becomes slightly appley.

Palate: Its a big spicy chocolate bomb at first but quickly settles down to become surprisingly soft. The nose suggested it might require water but so far the neat palate is very gentle. Its not the most complex of drams, lots of stewed fruit, lean bacon and nutty dryness, in other words some classic sherry flavours. The oak is a little too much for my taste in all honesty but I know many sherry fans who will love it.

Finish: Delicately spicy and quite long with those soft tannic oak notes fading away into the distance.

Comments: This is a good, uncomplicated sherried whisky. I find it too drying and heavy for my palate but its quality is undeniable, should be lots of fun for sherry heads.

Score: 88/100

Speyside’s Finest 42yo 1967/2010. Douglas Laing. 50%. 70cl.

Colour: Old Tokaji

Nose: Again quite prickly but with very similar profile to the previous one. This one is perhaps more flowery with some notes of rosewater and violets. There is also something slightly vegetal about it as well with orange marmalade, hessian and just a hint of struck flints but not what I would call an off note. This one is not technically as clean as the first one but so far I enjoy the nose more because I think these flinty/vegetal aromas make it more entertaining and unusual, they also seem to tame the intensity of the sherry quite efficiently.

Palate: This is quite different now, more expressive fruitiness than the first one and some really nice flavours of fig rolls and macaroons. It feels generally lighter than the first DL though not as light as the OB 40yo. That slight dirtiness has manifested itself as a beautiful earthiness on the palate, like freshly dug soil. Very deft spicy flourishes amongst the fruit and yet more dark chocolate. Quite an easy one to drink this one.

Finish: There is some lovely subtle menthol character on the swallow and a long well balanced finish to follow.

Comments: I like this one more than the first and I think its unusual nuances make it a more ambiguous and entertaining dram. Still an excellent example of a long aged, sherried Speysider.

Score: 89/100

Glenfarclas 40yo. OB. 46%. 70cl. circa 2010.

Colour: deep mahogany

Nose: Much softer and oilier than the previous two, similar level of wood influence but its much more balanced and delicately deployed here, feels straight away like it has benefitted from being bottled at 46%. Bags of stewed fruits, red berry compote and jam with quite a rich and elegant chocolate aroma. After a while it becomes slightly mentholated in the way that the best aged spirits often do, very attractive. The tannins on the nose in this one are much less aggressive than the other two, it even starts to develop some new fruit elements with notes of green and tropical fruits.

Palate: Rich and very sweet, quite a thick, oak laden delivery. The oak brings more of that menthol character and is very big but also very clean. I think that the oak works quite well to give the spirit some body and control. Quite raisiny, all the fruit character has become dried and concentrated and the drying oak and dark chocolate combo is well integrated, a very focused flavour profile. Opens up flavours of rancio and tobacco leaf along with a hint of something dirty but its entertaining not distracting, on the whole its very clean and highly polished sherry.

Finish: Big, drying, menthol and tannic finish. Quite mouthwatering and tingly. The finish is fairly long and leaves some lovely earthy, wet leaves flavours hanging around with more tobacco and old leather bound books.

Comments: Probably my favourite of the three and a fantastic fireside armchair dram. Not the easiest Glenfarclas for sure but a great example of well aged whisky and one where oak, though very prominent, has held the whole thing together very nicely.

Score: 90/100

And now the sacrilege part…

A vatting of all three

Its actually better than the sum of its parts. It seems to combine the best qualities of each individual sample. Lots more menthol and fruit character here and the oak has somehow become very deft and controlled. Very soft and easy on the palate with all the chocolate, fruit and spice components floating around together very harmoniously, great balance. Whoever said blending was difficult? This seems to happen so often when similar drams are quickly mixed together, I have seen it before where spirits can quickly bring out the best in each other. Try a vatting of all official releases of Port Ellen if you get the chance, or perhaps Port Ellen 30yo 9th release and Brora 30yo 2009 release, these are just a couple of other premium mixes that work really well. Obviously it helps if you’re very rich or a pretentious, scrounging twit like me. Have a glorious evening.

Debates age faster than whisky…

1 Jul

As I write this I am sitting in a shop that is doing its best to morph into the world’s first walk in microwave. Should I be working? Probably. Should I be drinking this beer under the counter? Probably not. Do I care? Nope.

Cold Beer. Two words that are to me this hot evening like a bubbly, well hopped symphony.

So it is with a fair measure of weary trepidation that I meander into the quagmire of this latest post. For I have decided that I will add my two farthings to this great big Hornet’s nest of a debate that Chivas have stirred up. When I say stirred up what I really mean is they’ve take a nest of Hornets, put it in a re-fill hogshead for at least 12 years till they’re really pissed off, then rolled it down a hill and released it as a special surprise bottling at this years whisky live. Its safe to say that everyone has aired their dirty laundry over this one. The whisky blogosphere has gone into indignant overdrive, some applauding and some bitching furiously about Chivas’ latest promotional, marketing thingy. Anyway before we go any further, here is the offending ad…

Now firstly lets get one thing clear, there are loads of shit whiskies in this world. There are young shit whiskies, ones that taste like nail varnish strained through a sock-full of pear drops. There are of course also a shed load of shit old whiskies, ones that are akin to a tannin smoothie garnished with a twist of sulphur. So obviously regardless of age there are badly made, badly matured whiskies. Now on one hand I have issues with what Chivas have said, specifically this bit from their PR bumf “One of the greatest influences on the flavour of whisky comes from maturation. Much of the complexity of Scotch whisky comes mainly from its time in oak casks in Scotland; with outstanding spirit and excellent wood management, it follows that the longer the maturation period, the more complex the whisky” Well that’s plainly a big pile of gibberish, yes of course good casks are important and when expertly handled in conjunction with great spirit there is the potential for fantastic whisky at a variety of ages. However it doesn’t mean that whisky can just keep on improving with age, the spirit of most distilleries declines in cask after 30-40 years. Distilleries that produce spirits that can age exceptionally and consistently are rare, Glen Grant, Strathisla, Macallan, Dalmore, Longmorn, Glanfarclas and maybe Balvenie spring to mind but there are many that simply fade out after too long. Wood inevitably conquers all, given enough time it consumes all traces of distillery character and complexity.

Bottled at around 45 years of age this is probably one of the finest 'old' whiskies ever bottled. But for this beauty how many 45yo, over oaked duds have there been?

However part of me really does sympathise with Chivas on this one, I don’t think their point is to get everyone to believe that older is better, just that no age statement, designer, youngsters dressed up in premium branding are not the way forward. I agree with this sentiment, there have been a plethora of NAS overpriced young bottlings in recent years, with quality and price very out of sync. There are exceptions of course, Chivas’ own A’bunadh, Longrow CV, Caol Ila Cask Strength and Laphroaig Quater Cask, although those are all either bolstered by peat or sherry. There is obviously the problem for many companies now that they have insufficient stock as well, the demand for premium malts, single casks and the increase in independent bottlers have all put a big strain on supplies of aged malts.

Glenmorangie has been holding the flag for a different attitude towards premium whiskies, that of the NAS designer, cuvée style malt.

I tend to lean toward supporting Chivas on this one because, for me personally, the best whiskies tend to be between 12 and 25 years of age. There are many older malts that I love but they become quite hit and miss after they get past 30. There are barely a handful of bottlings I can think of under ten years of age that would be considered great bottlings. But then there is the issue of bottle aging seeing as most of the ones I can think of were bottled some time ago. However I don’t think we need to open a big can of worms to go with our already ungainly Hornet’s nest.

A handy visual metaphor for the bottle aging debate which we'll tackle another day methinks.

Obviously this is very much IMHO, everyone enjoys different styles of whisky. I remember when many of the very young heavily peated malts started appearing, they were fun but I think the novelty is starting to wear off now. We’ve all grown up a little, they’re like cannabis, something you flirt with giddily as a young student but that you ultimately grow out of. However maybe that analogy isn’t so good, I don’t want to compare the finest aged whiskies to class A drugs, who wants to inject 1937 Strathisla when you can drink the stuff? Lets forget that one. Sometimes it is very refreshing to enjoy a young malt, their zingy, vibrant, youthful characters can be nourishing and fun. However I can’t help but feel that they just don’t stand up to their slightly older counterparts. I love complexity, balance and depth of flavour in whisky (who doesn’t?) and this just cannot be developed without time. No amount of wood technology can sufficiently accelerate the process and too long a time, even in great casks, can just as easily undo all a spirit’s luster. As I said before there are many dreadful whiskies of all ages, but there are also many great whiskies of all ages, its just that in my experience the greatest ones have had a little bit longer in the cask to come to their full potential. I suppose in the end we arrive back at that old chestnut “Its all about balance”, yawn. Sod whisky, I want another frosty beer…